Biochemistry

   

Turnover and Catalytic Cycle Frequency Determination based on Molar Mass-dependent Model Equations

Authors: Ikechukwu Iloh Udema

There were conflicting definitions and misrepresentations of turnover frequency (TOF), catalytic cycle frequency (CCF), and catalytic first-order rate constant (k_cat) in the literature. Based on the Benfield and Lineweaver-Burk methods, data were generated. The results indicated that the CCFs for the forward (~ 0.0025-1.58 exp. (+17)/s) and reverse (~ 0.0003-5.4 exp. (+18)/s) directions showed an increasing trend with higher concentrations of the enzyme; this was applicable to the TOF. The number of fragments per molecule of an enzyme in the forward direction was 0.19-1.23 exp. (+5). In conclusion, TOF and CCF are different parameters, and the former in particular was not the same as k_cat, while the latter was a constant; TOF and CCF vary. Strictly speaking, TOF was equal to f(M_3). Besides, CCF per molecule (> 1) of the enzyme is greater than TOF (< 1). This can be verified using sucrase in a future study; a larger data set is needed if starch is a substrate in order to reevaluate the models and address statistical concerns. PACS: 87.15.RJ; 87.14.ejKeywords: Aspergillus oryzae alpha-amylase; Catalytic cycle frequency; First-order catalytic rate constant; Gelatinized insoluble potato starch; Turnover number; Turnover number frequency.

Comments: 23 Pages. [New version of] ChemRxiv via 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-0sjpl

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-04-11 21:46:53

Unique-IP document downloads: 126 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus