Biochemistry

   

Temporal Dislocation and Theoretical Reconstruction in the History of Science: A Unified Interpretation from Ion Channels to DNA Replication

Authors: Sun Zuodong

Many major breakthroughs in modern life sciences display a prominent feature of phenomenon observation preceding structural analysis in the historical timeline. To fill cognitive gaps, classical theoretical systems often rely on auxiliary hypotheses to maintain logical consistency, which inadvertently increases theoretical complexity and violates the principle of simplicity pursued by science. This paper systematically reviews the complete course from the cognition of neuron structure, the discovery of cellular bioelectric phenomena, and the proposal of the sodium-potassium pump hypothesis to the structural elucidation of ion channels and the DNA double helix, clearly identifying the inherent theoretical contradictions caused by the lag in observation timing. On this basis, returning to the fundamental laws of biophysics, this paper proposes the ion channel windmill model for explaining action potentials and the DNA tetramer whole-chain transmission model for interpreting genetic information transfer. The new model system abandons redundant hypotheses, features a more concise logical chain, and puts forward several key experimentally testable predictions, providing a more internally consistent unified theoretical framework for neuroscience and molecular biology.

Comments: 8 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: Further repetition will not be accepted)

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-04-06 20:50:27

Unique-IP document downloads: 58 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus