Relativity and Cosmology

   

The 3.998D Manifold Framework: Assessment of Geometric Unification and the Resolution of Galactic Rotation Anomalies

Authors: Charles Opoku

This paper presents the results of the application of the 3.998D Manifold Framework, a geometric theory that posits all physical phenomena emerge from a scalar field (ϕ-Field) within a space of spectral dimension d_s=3.998 and a dimensional deficit of δ=0.002. Unlike standard cosmological models that require Dark Matter and Dark Energy to resolve dynamic anomalies, this framework introduces a single density-dependent mechanism governed by a manifold stiffness constant (β_eff ≈ 5.01). The proposed Framework further demonstrate that this constant is the geometric reciprocal of a 13.4% metric compaction, providing a structural bridge that unifies subatomic bond tension with galactic dynamics. Analysis shows that this geometric constraint successfully unifies physics across subatomic, galactic, and cosmic scales. Statistical modelling of galactic rotation curves for the Milky Way, Andromeda (M31), Triangulum (M33), UGC 128, and NGC 2403, demonstrates that the framework’s saturation mechanism replaces the need for invisible mass, achieving statistically significant improvements over Newtonian predictions while recovering standard gravity in high-density solar systems.

Comments: 16 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: Please submit article written with AI assistance to ai.viXra.org)

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-02-13 21:00:22

Unique-IP document downloads: 611 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus