Social Science

   

Highway to Madness: Argentina’s Chaotic Descent into a Strange Attractor

Authors: Nestor E. Ramos

Argentina's political and economic trajectory since 1930 represents not a series of random misfortunes or isolated failures, but rather a deterministic yet chaotic descent into a self-reinforcing social attractor characterized by persistent decay, as illuminated by the principles of chaos theory. This paper employs a meticulously constructed justice-weighted Composite Social Stability Index (SSI), derived from six fundamental socioeconomic indicators, inflation rates, GDP growth, presidential instability, poverty levels, unemployment rates, and the Gini index, to quantitatively demonstrate the chaotic nature of Argentina's systemic evolution. By weighting poverty and inequality more heavily, our SSI functions as a moral compass, rejecting the neoliberal fallacy that ‘stability’ without justice is desirable. Our analysis reveals key characteristics of this chaotic system: a high Hurst exponent indicating strong persistence and long-term memory in instability patterns; a positive maximum Lyapunov exponent confirming sensitive dependence on initial conditions, the hallmark of chaos; and a fractal dimension suggestive of a strange attractor, where the system's behavior is bounded yet unpredictable and non-repeating.

Comments: 27 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: Please submit article written with AI assistance to ai.viXra.org)

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-01-21 23:18:21

Unique-IP document downloads: 103 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus