Authors: Hyoyoung Choi
In this paper, we present a compelling alternative to the Standard Model's Higgs mechanism. Our framework is built on two core principles: 1) the mass of particles originates from the self-energy of their associated gauge fields, where composite particles exhibit effective charges arising from gauge dynamics, and 2) certain massive bosons are composite systems. We model the Z^0 and H^0 bosons as the ground and first excited states of a composite W^+ W^− system. The most powerful aspect of this work is our striking, model-independent prediction: the binding distances of Z^0 and H^0 are related by r_H ≈ 2r_Z. This relationship naturally explains their spin difference-vector Z^0 (S=1) and scalar H^0 (S=0)-as triplet and singlet states of the W^+W^− system. Our model makes concrete, falsifiable predictions, including a second excited state with a predicted mass of approximately Z_3 ≈135.4 GeV. The search for this resonance at future colliders constitutes a crucial test that could serve as key experimental evidence for questioning fundamental assumptions about electroweak symmetry breaking. By identifying Z^0 and H^0 as different states of the same underlying system, we explain their masses without invoking the Higgs field, thereby resolving the vacuum energy fine-tuning problem. The Higgs mechanism appears to be an unnecessary construct, as the problem it addresses finds a more natural solution in the inherent properties of effective charges emerging from gauge dynamics and composite structures.
Comments: 23 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2025-12-09 15:49:23
Unique-IP document downloads: 220 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.