Authors: Dapeng Zhu
The Standard Model of particle physics relies on the point-particle hypothesis, which inherentlyleads to renormalization divergences and fails to derive the elementary charge e from first principles. In this article, we propose a non-perturbative geometric unification model where the electron is reconstructed as a toroidal photon soliton confined within a Kerr-Newman vacuum background. By unifying Einstein-Cartan gravity with Born-Infeld electrodynamics, we demonstrate that the stability of such solitons arises from the dynamical equilibrium between torsion-induced gravitational attraction and non-linear electromagnetic repulsion at the Schwinger limit. We rigorously derive theelementary charge as a topological winding number, corrected by a metric coupling factor χ ≈ 1.092 which arises from the frame-dragging effect of the rotating vacuum. This geometric correction successfully resolves the long-standing 8.5% discrepancy in the semi-classical Williamson-van der Mark model. Furthermore, we discuss the phenomenological consistency of this extended structure with high-energy scattering experiments via Bjorken scaling. The model suggests that the Higgs field is the order parameter of a torsion condensate, providing a unified geometric origin for mass, charge, and the cosmological constant.
Comments: 3 Pages. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17650976 (Note by viXra Admin: Please submit article written with AI assistance to ai.viXra.org)
Download: PDF
[v1] 2025-11-21 00:33:34
Unique-IP document downloads: 250 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.