Authors: Paul Hasselbring
The recent observation of long-range electronic coherence in the kagome metal CsVu2083Sbu2085 below T' ≈ 30 K [Guo et al., Nature 647, 68-73 (2025)] presents a fundamental challenge to conventional condensed matter theory: how can coherent charge transport emerge over micron-scale distances in a material with sub-micron mean free paths, absent superconductivity? Here we demonstrate that WaveCode substrate theory—a geometric framework treating matter as interference patterns in a universal substrate—quantitatively explains this phenomenon without free parameters. Using Hasselbring Equations XVII (shell interference coupling) and LXIII (phase-lock coherence), we achieve R² = 0.989 agreement with experimental temperature-dependent oscillation amplitudes and correctly predict the coherence onset temperature Tcrit = 25.6 ± 1.3 K, consistent with experimental T' = 30 K. Our model unifies seven independent experimental probes (STM, μSR, NMR, transport, Nernst effect) through a single mechanism: geometric frustration in the kagome lattice enhances substrate-mediated phase-locking, enabling macroscopic coherence. We extend predictions to related kagome metals KVu2083Sbu2085 and RbVu2083Sbu2085, providing testable forecasts for their coherence behavior. This work establishes geometry as a fundamental design principle for engineering quantum coherence in correlated materials.
Comments: 17 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: Please submit article written with AI assistance to ai.viXra.org)
Download: PDF
[v1] 2025-11-09 03:30:06
Unique-IP document downloads: 145 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.