Authors: P. G.Vejde
Recently published analysis of JWST deep field images confirms the previously observed trend for a surplus of spiral galaxies that rotate counter to our Milky Way. A trend that apparently is most pronounced the closer one looks towards either the north or south Milky Way polar axis. This is considered in recently published analyses to be inconsistent with current theories of the Big Bang. It is also suggested in these analyses that this surplus may only be an observational bias. Due possibly to Doppler shifting from the relative rotation directions between spiral galaxies and our own Milky Way. Or that new physics of galaxy rotations not yet discovered may also be able to account for the apparent surplus. However, the authors of this research also note that Doppler shifting of light from the relative rotation velocities and rotation directions between any one galaxy and the earth observer would be insufficient in magnitude to account for the approximately 50% surplus of counter rotating galaxies in the latest deep field JWST data. In this paper the aforementioned observational bias is still considered a possibility simply by invoking the centuries old classical effect of Stellar Aberration to model the apparent surplus of counter rotating galaxies seen in the data. In that due to differences in transverse rotational directions and internal stellar velocities between any observed spiral galaxy and our own Milky Way, the displacement effects of stellar aberration will make light from co rotating galaxies incident to the earth observer more dispersed or blurred than light coming from counter rotating galaxies. Thus, making it harder to identify co rotating spiral galaxies than counter rotating spiral galaxies at any similar redshift. Resulting in an apparent surplus of counter rotating galaxies in the universe.
Comments: 4 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: The list of scientific references are incomplete)
Download: PDF
[v1] 2025-09-26 23:11:35
Unique-IP document downloads: 154 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.