Astrophysics

   

The Original Electron-positron Pairs Are Pseudo-bosons Because They Are Causally Separated by Inflation

Authors: Dominique Mareau

The local experimental production of electron-positron pairs or proton-antiproton pairs clearly indicates their instability. But if positrons are isolated, their annihilation is temporarily avoided. Positrons thus causally separated from ambient particles prolong their lifetime. It is clear that the protons forming the matter of the universe are stable. It is proposed here that the original inflation causally separated the elements of each electron-positron pair. The cosmological principle stipulates the identity between all localities. However, there is a duality of locality between any "Locality-type" and the Original Non-Locality (ONL) caused by inflation proposed by Alan Guth. It is reasonable to think that inflation could have causally separated each element of electron-positron pair from the same original source. Thus relocated, these elements of pairs from different sources can merge without annihilating each other. Thus becoming stable, the ONL type electron-positron pair is a candidate to be the elementary particle suggested by John Wheeler. Beyond the falsification criterion, this paradigm resolves several fundamental enigmas, including the mass of the proton and the strange identity of its charge with that of the positron.

Comments: 9 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2025-09-21 21:09:14

Unique-IP document downloads: 153 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus