Authors: Dan Zachary
We propose the Quantum Uncertainty-Informed Networked Teleportation protocol, or QUINT, a framework for extracting energy from quantum vacuum fluctuations by exploiting spatially-structured entanglement. Extending conventional quantum energy teleportation (QET) protocols, QUINT protocol hypothesizes that entanglement correlations may be geometrically organized, inspired by the ER=EPR conjecture (treated here as a heuristic for structured entanglement). This structure enables enhanced energy extraction and directional sensitivity across a network of QET nodes. We present the formalism for per-cycle energy extraction, including constraints imposed by quantum energy inequalities, and introduce a simple dynamical model for entanglement depletion and recovery. Observable signatures of the protocol include localized stress-energy redistributions, phase shifts, and anisotropies in extraction efficiency. Our framework provides a pathway to probe structured vacuum entanglement and suggests experimentally testable predictions for quantum-optical or field-theoretic systems. By focusing on measurable energy flows rather than speculative geometries, the QUINT protocol establishes a novel approach to quantum energy engineering and lays the groundwork for exploring the operational consequences of vacuum entanglement networks.
Comments: 24 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: Please submit article written with AI assistance to ai.viXra.org)
Download: PDF
[v1] 2025-08-29 20:15:40
Unique-IP document downloads: 438 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.