Number Theory

   

Computational Evidence for Attractor Dynamics in Riemann Zero Gap Prediction: A Novel Framework for Critical Line Analysis

Authors: Jordan Gidman

We present computational evidence for a novel framework suggesting that the critical line σ = 1 2 in the Riemann zeta function exhibits mathematical attractor properties for zero formation and gap prediction. Through systematic analysis of Dirichlet partial sum approximations across verified nontrivial zeros, we demonstrate that metrics measuring zero-formation dynamics consistently peak at σ = 1 2 with remarkable stability across parameter variations. Our bootstrap resampling analysis yields a zero-collapse attractor location of σ = 0.500000±0.000000 across 20 independent trials (n=500 each). We introduce a gap-confidence prediction framework achieving 50% success rates within calibrated uncertainty bounds while maintaining 1.23% relative prediction accuracy. Comparative analysis between ζ(s) and 1/ζ(s) reveals identical predictive behavior, suggesting functional invariance of gap patterns. These findings support a conjecture that the Riemann Hypothesis emerges from fundamental attractor dynamics rather than coincidental zero placement, providing new computational approaches to critical line analysis.

Comments: 13 Pages. https://github.com/CoreTheoretics/Riemann-Scripts (Note by viXra Admin: Please submit article written with AI assistance to ai.viXra.org)

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2025-08-23 22:38:38

Unique-IP document downloads: 290 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus