Relativity and Cosmology

   

A Relativistic Space-Time Displacement Model for Electron and Neutron Emergence: Request for Experimental Validation

Authors: Adrian Guerrero

We propose a novel hypothesis where space-time is a superfluid-like field, and particlessuch as electrons and neutrons emerge as solitons or composite configurations from proton-induced displacements. The proton is modeled as a 2+1D boundary at radius rp ≈ 0.84 fm, with no interior volume, akin to a black hole shell. Electrons arise as solitons with energy E = gempc2 · αγrp ℏ/mec2 , and neutrons are composite states of proton, electron-like, and neutrino-like modes. Relativistic time dilation, with Δtobs ≈ 1.96 × 10−20 s for electron emergence and τobs ≈ 71.2 days for neutron decay at γ = 7000, governs soliton formation and stability. The model reinterprets the double-slit experiment’s wave-particle duality, integrates Quantum Chromodynamics(QCD) via a 2+1D confinement shell, and addresses anomalies like LHCb’s RK ≈ 0.85(3.1σ), ATLAS’s t¯t entanglement (6.7σ), and Fermi-LAT’s electron excess ( 3σ). Witha likelihood of 25—30%, competitive with supersymmetry ( 10—20%) but below theStandard Model ( 80—90%), we request experimental tests at LHC, JLab, and NISTto validate predictions, including 2D form factors, jet angularity, neutron radius, andlifetime variability.

Comments: 4 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: Please submit article written with AI assistance to ai.viXra.org)

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2025-07-20 21:08:00

Unique-IP document downloads: 116 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus