Quantum Physics

   

A Binary Scalar Symbolic Field Yields Elementary Particles Consistent With General Relativity

Authors: Michael Hirsch Tomasson

The Standard Model and Quantum Field Theory (QFT) describe the microscopic world with remarkable precision, while General Relativity (GR) provides an apparently accurate account of spacetime and gravity. Yet fundamental gaps remain. These range from the measurement problem to unresolved discrepancies such as the muon ( g{-}2 ) anomaly and the vacuum energy density. To address these challenges, we introduce a Symbolic Structure Field Theory (SSFT) rooted in a binary scalar field ( psi_0 ), extended by a local vector field ( psi_1 ) that detects entropy gradients, and a fiber bundle gauge field ( psi_2 ) enabling motif classification and dynamics. Strikingly, 14 unique-under-manifold-roation 8-bit (2{times}2{times}2) motifs in ( psi_0 ) yield a clean physical correspondence with the elementary particles of QFT. The framework also encodes geodesic curvature from motif structure, obviating the need for a cosmological constant. Furthermore, while the $C_8$ formalism is proved un-computable, higher n bitmotifs such as $C_{17}$ admit computability. Using a symbolic Turing machine, an observer is defined within SSFT. This formalism is not intended to displace existing QFT predictive structures, but to provide generative reframing.

Comments: 87 Pages. 8 figures, 173 equations

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2025-07-19 01:33:53
[v2] 2025-08-04 20:27:39

Unique-IP document downloads: 372 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus