Authors: Alok Kr. Nirala, Suruchi Kumari
This project develops a non-geometric framework for black hole physics by rejecting the existence of spacetime geometry as a fundamental structure independent of the observer.It interprets the emergence of geometric features as a byproduct of memory and comparison between informational states within finite time intervals. Entropy is redefined as a measure of accessible uncertainty shaped by the observer’s record, rather than as a geometric quantity. The black hole information paradox is resolved by discarding the notion of objective information loss across the horizon and instead understanding evaporation as an update in the observer’s informational context.Three original computational models substantiate this framework: Model 1 captures entropy growth through internal decoherence and coherence disintegration; Model 2 models entropy dynamics as conditioned by observer-dependent informational access; Model 3 simulates nonlocal scrambling of mutual information without invoking geometric transport. These simulations demonstrate that black hole evaporation and information recovery can be consistently explained through observer-relative informational transitions. This perspective offers a coherent foundation where evolution, entropy, physical structures and known interactions emerge from information-theoretic constraints, without invoking underlying geometric assumptions.
Comments: 73 Pages. Distributed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Download: PDF
[v1] 2025-07-16 20:18:56
Unique-IP document downloads: 179 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.