Astrophysics

   

Dark Mass is Potential Energy (in French)

Authors: Nicolas Poupart

This paper demonstrates that gravitational potential energy (E = −GmM/d) accounts for the phenomenon commonly attributed to dark matter, by applying the mass-energy equivalence relation (E = mc2). No additional assumptions are made beyond the principle of volume conservation, ensuring that the gravitational _eld remains conservative and uninfluenced by forces other than gravity. We develop a straightforward equation and algorithm to accurately compute the potential energy of a stellar system. The theoretical implications of this model are explored with respect to energy production by various types of stars and black holes in galaxies. The model is empirically tested against the SPARC database comprising 175 galaxies to assess its validity. We continue by verifying that our model reproduces the total galactic and extragalactic dark mass and is compatible with ΛCDM cosmology. Then we demonstrate that the experimental adequacy of our model reaches 5σ. We derive the logical consequences of the potential energy stored in the gravitational field; a claim validated by SPARC data. We conclude that, to ensure the consistency of our model across the entire cosmic history, it is necessary to impose the conservation of the cosmological energy balance.

Comments: 44 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2025-05-21 19:45:02
[v2] 2025-06-06 20:13:33
[v3] 2025-06-22 21:15:30
[v4] 2025-07-28 20:48:45
[v5] 2025-09-09 21:00:54

Unique-IP document downloads: 682 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus