Authors: Lino Zamboni
In 1965, the Nobel Prize was awarded for the modern formulation of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) to R.P. Feynman for his diagrammatic method, J. Schwinger for the operator method, and S.-I. Tomonaga for his relativistic derivation. Subsequently, P. Kusch performed a precise measurement of the electron's anomalous magnetic moment, providing a critical test validating QED's computational methods, which proved to be extremely accurate. Nevertheless, QED is based on a physically unrealistic assumption—mathematically circumvented—that the electron is a dimensionless point particle endowed with physical properties "ex abrupto." This work, developed within a deterministic and non-local dBBZ (modified de Broglie—Bohm) theory, models the electron as an entangled and distributed structure, as proposed in previous studies. It enables the calculation of the electron's anomalous magnetic moment as a consequence of its intrinsic structure, without employing QED techniques. The method involves calculating, for each orbital, the anomalous moment modified to account for the influence of existing magnetic fields. Subsequently, entanglement is imposed on the sum of these moments, and from the total orbital anomalous moment thus obtained, the theoretical magnetic anomaly is derived and compared with the corresponding experimental value, yielding relative errors on the order of 10^-12. This procedure, which allows for greater theoretical precision than current methods, necessitates a similar, albeit more complex, calculation of the muon's anomalous magnetic moment. This is because a specific parameter, termed the "source parameter," selected within an allowable range, requires dual verification to be adopted with high precision. The theoretical determination of the muon's anomalous magnetic moment is also presented in a subsequent document, employing analogous computational procedures.
Comments: 7 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2025-05-19 21:27:40
[v2] 2026-03-11 21:01:28
Unique-IP document downloads: 260 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.