Relativity and Cosmology

   

Euclidean Cosmology (EC) as an Alternative Framework to Standard Cosmology

Authors: Joseph Bakhos

Euclidean Cosmology (EC) is introduced as an alternative framework to General Relativity (GR) and the ΛCDM model. EC retains Euclidean space and proposes that gravity is a residual effect of electromagnetism rather than a fundamental force. The theory replaces the standard expansion model with cyclic expansion and contraction phases governed by large-scale gravitational oscillations. The redshift in EC is explained through a combination of Dopplermotion and a refined tired-light mechanism. Time dilation and light deflection arise from neutrino scattering rather than space-time curvature, preserving a Euclidean structure.EC naturally explains the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) power spectrum without requiring inflation, aligns with observed large-scale structure, and provides a resolution to the Hubble tension within a non-expanding spaceframework. The theory predicts a self-regulating cosmic equilibrium maintained by an outer shell of the intergalactic medium, preventing energy loss and sustaining cyclic dynamics. The observed galactic rotation curves, large-scalefilament-and-void cosmic structures, and elemental recycling in Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) are also consistent with the EC gravitational model.

Comments: 21 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: Please submit article written with AI assistance to ai.viXra.org)

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2025-04-14 00:45:57

Unique-IP document downloads: 321 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus