Authors: Hongyuan Ye
As a theoretically complete fundamental principle of electromagnetism for nearly two centuries, Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction states that the induction voltage in a metal coil is proportional to the number of turns in the coil and the rate of change of magnetic flux through a single turn. Recent research points out that Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction is only an engineering approximation formula,and that Lorentz's magnetic force theorem is the microphysical mechanism of electromagnetic induction. This verification experiment uses two induction coils, CA and CB, of the same structure and size. Coil CA has a single-layer dense winding of 30 turns, and coil CB has a single-layer evenly spaced winding of 15 turns. The induction voltages of coils CA and CB are detected under low and high frequency signals, respectively. The experiment proves that: under low-frequency signals, Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction is an engineering approximation formula. However, under high-frequency (RF) signals, Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction is completely incorrect. Under RF signals, the coil induction voltage depends mainly on the relationship between the wire length and the RF wavelength, as well as the strength of the electromagnetic field radiation attenuation. The coil induction voltage has no direct relationship with the number of turns of the coil.
Comments: 5 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2025-03-24 01:49:00
[v2] 2025-05-11 20:19:04
Unique-IP document downloads: 441 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.