Authors: Dara O. Shayda
In March of 1845 Gauss described the conception of an action at a distance, propagated with a finite velocity, the natural generalization to electrodynamics view of Newtonian force. Unsuccessfully, Wheeler and Feynman attempted a new theory for Absorber in 1945 [9]. In their paper there is a detailed reference provided by Prof. Einstein about a relatively unknown physicist named Hugo Tetrode[10,11] and quoted: "The sun would not radiate if it were alone in space and no other bodies could absorb its radiation... If for example I observed through my telescope yesterday evening that star which let us say is 100 lights years away, then not only did I know that the light which it allowed to reach my eyes was emitted 100 years ago, but also the star or individual atoms of it knew already 100 years ago that ‘I’, who then did not even exit, would view it yesterday evening at such and such timeu2026"[11]. The process by which the verb "knew"occurs is modelled by the Noetic morphisms of the arr(Decay) Arrow Category. However this treatise is not about energy emission absorption in nature, rather about their mechanism of information knowledge exchange to make the emission possible.This treatise and its categorical constructions, Universal Properties and symbols pave the way for grammars and functions and operators and Formal Systems (algebras, calculi) of de novo programming languages to describe the nature of specific Emitter Absorber coupling.
Comments: 8 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2025-03-04 21:53:40
Unique-IP document downloads: 175 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.