Number Theory

   

An Algorithmic Approach to Solving the Collatz/syracuse Problem

Authors: Laurent Nedelec

After introducing definitions related to the Collatz problem (Part 1), the concept of "verified integers" and several organizational rules around this concept are presented (Part 2). A unique logical tool, the axis of verified integers, is highlighted (Part 3). In Part 4 , it is proven that all bounded trajectories without non-trivial cycles are verified. These elements allow the development of a systematic approach to solving the Collatz problem with the help of inverse graphs (Part 5). The issue of non-trivial cycles and divergent trajectories is then explored (Parts 6 and 7). Ultimately, we arrive at two contradictory propositions :1) Either all integers satisfy the Collatz conjecture, or2) An infinite number of integers do not satisfy it. This eliminates the possibility that only a small number of integers fail to satisfy the conjecture, while the rest do. The conclusion of this study leans toward the first solution : all integers satisfy the Collatz conjecture.This text, written in English, is a translation of the original French text published five months ago on Vixra (Vixra 2410.0063) under the title "New tools to verify the Collatz conjecture". During the translation process, Parts 5, 6 and 7 were extensively revised, resulting in a new text that differs from the initial French version.

Comments: 37 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2025-02-08 21:53:01

Unique-IP document downloads: 205 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus