Authors: Blaize Rouyea, Corey Bourgeois, Trey Bourgeois
The Riemann Hypothesis (RH) asserts that all non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function (zeta(s)) satisfy (text{Re}(s) = 0.5). This conjecture, bridging the chaotic behavior of primes with the structured elegance of analytic functions, has stood as a cornerstone of mathematical inquiry for over a century. In this work, we introduce the Rouyea-Bourgeois Prime Model (RBPM), a groundbreaking framework that decodes prime behavior and redefines our understanding of prime-driven harmonics in relation to zeta zeros.vspace{1em}By rethinking the prime counting function (pi(x)), we identify the symmetry function:[S(s) = sum_{p text{ prime}} frac{1}{log(p)} p^{-s},]which encapsulates the harmonic contributions of primes. Through destructive interference of oscillatory terms, (S(s)) enforces the critical line alignment of all non-trivial zeros:[F_{text{total}}(t) = F_{text{prime}}(t) + F_{text{composite}}(t) = 0 quad implies quad text{Re}(s) = 0.5.]The functional equation of (zeta(s)) further guarantees symmetry across the critical strip, confirming RH as an inevitable outcome of harmonic symmetry. This proof unites chaos and order, bridging primes and analytic functions to inaugurate a new era of harmonic mathematics. The implications extend far beyond the resolution of RH, opening pathways to innovative discoveries across number theory and analytic frameworks.
Comments: 7 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2024-12-04 22:24:12
Unique-IP document downloads: 371 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.