Physics of Biology

   

Questioning Darwin-Malthusian Hypothesis: Extended Critics to Darwin’s Evolutionary Process of History (Updated)

Authors: Victor Christianto, Florentin Smarandache

As Rev. John Polkinghorne, the late professor of mathematical physics and priest, wrote:"The idea of a ready-made world was replaced by that of a creation so endowed by its Creatorwith potentiality that creatures could be allowed ‘to make themselves’ (Charles Kingsley)through the explorations of evolutionary process. The history of the world is to be understood as an unfolding act of continuous creation. Such a creation is a great good, but it has an inescapable shadow side for evolution results not only in great fertility but also in blind alleys and extinctions. Genetic mutation produces both new life forms and also malignancy, and one cannot have the one without the other. Theology can find here some help from science as it wrestles with the perplexities of natural evil and suffering." (cf. Polkinghorne, The University of Edinburgh, 2009). Notably several scholars have come up with differentarguments to criticize Darwin’s evolution theory, for instance Ernst Cassirer Vern Poythress with Interpreting Eden, and Jaroslav Flegr, with his book Frozen evolution, that is not the way it is, mr Darwin. The present review is intended to bring more arguments in particular from recent development of low-temperature physics and its connection to cosmology. (published in Octogon Mathematical Magazine, vol. 32, no. 2, Oct. 2024, 970-986)

Comments: 14 Pages. published in Octogon Mathematical Magazine, vol. 32, no. 2, Oct. 2024, 970-986

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2024-08-31 07:27:47

Unique-IP document downloads: 207 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus