Authors: Roland Pabisch
The anomalous alignment between the CMB quadrupole and octopole, that they are jointly perpendicular to the ecliptic plane, and also aligned with the direction of the solar dipole near to the equinoxes are up to now unsolved conundrums. The preferred axis in the cosmic radiation anisotropy and the alignments were dubbed "axis of evil" (Land & Magueijo, 2005), and are the most prominent of the CMB anomalies. It is standard that the 1st order term of the dipole formula essentially represents a motion induced Doppler temperature pattern against the isotropic Planckian radiation field. We argue that the Doppler term is entirely a function of the peculiar velocity of the Planck space telescope in the CMB rest-frame (CMB-space).In two recent publications of us we have found solutions to the flyby anomalies and to the residual annual and diurnal P 10 signal variations on top of the resolved P 10 acceleration anomaly, using the peculiar velocity of Earth and the peculiar velocities of the involved space probes in the CMB-space. That two independent solutions are corroborating our assertion that the quadrupolar and octopolar terms, following from the 2nd order term in β = v/c expanding of the dipole formula, are not "relativistic corrections to the solar dipole, producing second order anisotropies at multipoles l ≥ 1, with amplitudes proportional to βl, and more importantly couple the two dipole components" (Planck Collaboration, 2015).Instead, the 2nd order term of the dipole formula, the inverse γ - factor, represents solely the annual eigen-frequency oscillations of the Planck HFI, proportional to the annual eigen-time variations in the fundamental CMB-space, as a function of the peculiar velocity of the Planck space telescope, leading to a solution of the only seemingly anomalous alignments.
Comments: 6 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2024-07-28 17:06:00
Unique-IP document downloads: 329 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.