I argue that the JWST findings on early galaxies, along with other discrepancies such as Hubble’s constant tension, cast serious doubt on the validity of the Big Bang theory. The first JWST findings regarding early galaxies were observed only two years ago. These findings are not consistent with the Big Bang theory (BB), which posits that as we look back in time towards the Big Bang, early galaxies should appear small and underdeveloped because there hadn't been enough time for them to evolve. However, the JWST findings have shown the opposite. Early galaxies (approximately 400 million years after the Big Bang) appear fully developed, similar to galaxies like the Milky Way, which is estimated to be around 13.6 billion years old. Some scientists have questioned the validity of the Big Bang theory; however, many are hesitant to dismiss it based on these findings. They argue that our understanding of galaxy formation in the early universe requires refinement. As research continues and new early galaxies are observed, the initial finding that galaxies appear fully developed persists, regardless of the time elapsed since the Big Bang.I suggest here an alternative model of the universe, I designate the Pivot universe, that explains the JWST finding on early galaxies.