Relativity and Cosmology

   

The Evidence of Absence of the Accelerating Expansion of the Universe

Authors: Pavlo Danylchenko

It was shown that Etherington’s identity is paralogism. Etherington’s identity is based on the imaginary relativistic dilation of intrinsic time of the galaxy by (1+z) times, but the presence of a relativistic anisotropy of luminosity of stars quickly moving away from it is ignored in the frame of reference of spatial coordinates and time (FR) of the observer. Etherington did not take into account the fact that the Universe is homogeneous only in the comoving FR in the expanding Universe, and recklessly made a "mix" of the phenomena and features inherent in two different FRs. It is shown that, according to General Relativity (GR), only the transverse metric distances — the transverse comoving distance and the angular diameter distance similar to it — can obey the Hubble linear dependence. The transverse comoving distance belongs to the comoving FR in the ex-panding Universe and is determined by the redshift z of the emission wavelength. The angular diameter distance belongs to the FR of observer of an expanding Universe and is deter-mined by the redshift of the frequency of the emission wave. The luminosity distance is not the transverse metric distance and therefore its dependence on redshift is nonlinear. It is taken into account that the Hubble constant, like the length standards and the constant of the velocity of light, is a fun-damentally unchangeable quantity in the rigid FRs. Its exact value is empirically found.

Comments: 5 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2024-06-22 09:20:33

Unique-IP document downloads: 99 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus