Authors: Dmitriy S. Tipikin
For the long time the idea of Big Bang and expanding Universe was predominant in physics community. While originally tired light idea was expressed by Hubble himself it was rejected by others due to mainly two factors: all existing mechanisms of photon scattering would lead to one-step light scattering, image blurring and thus even close galaxies are not possible to observe [1] and the dispersion of the red shift was exactly proportional to energy and the only mechanism known at that time with precisely that dependence was Doppler mechanism. Thus the idea of Big Bang was born and eventually lead to the present situation: James Webb Space Telescope discovered galaxies presumably very young (300 millions years from Big Bang point of view) but with stars at least as old as 2 billions years old (from well established theories of star ageing and metallicity laws well confirmed in close areas of Universe). Essentially very young galaxies consist from start as old as Sun or even older. This is the most striking contradiction in addition to the absence of Tolman effect and presence of what seems to be active galactic nuclei in the young galaxies, presence of already dead galaxies in "early" Universe, too high metallicity and other phenomena [1]. Recently the idea of scattering of photons being implemented in enormously small steps was proposed [1] and that lead to explanation which easily describes red shift with almost unnoticeable scattering for close galaxies (energy drain proportional to N number of interactions but change of angle proportional to sqrt(N) and for huge N light scattering is not easy to observe for close objects). However, despite very small, light scattering and image blurring should be present in images of very far objects and this phenomenon was indeed present in images made by James Webb Space Telescope [1]. The same scattering must be also visible for the closer but smaller objects like supernovas and indeed retro-analysis of supernova 1a light curves (standard candles) as function of distance confirms the model outlined in [1] to some extent.
Comments: 7 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2024-05-29 03:15:31
Unique-IP document downloads: 209 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.