Set Theory Can’t be Directly Representative of Algebraic Constructions in Goldbach Conjecture and Other NT Problems

Juan Elias Millas Vera

Set Theory Can’t be Directly Representative of Algebraic Constructions in Goldbach Conjecture and Other NT Problems

In this paper I want to express my thoughts on the non possible link between set theory arguments in Number Theory. It is maybe good a first approximation to a problem to think in relation to sets, but my actual thinking is that you can’t solve an algebraic construction with a direct implication between the set and the algebraic variable. As example I will analyze my past trying to prove strong Goldbach conjecture. Finally I explain other version of this topic also with Goldbach conjectures as examples.

Comments: 3 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2024-03-06 02:39:57

Unique-IP document downloads: 121 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.