Nuclear and Atomic Physics

   

Uk Versus Usa and Ussr Nuclear Warhead Designs History and Its Relevance for Today's Strategic and Tactical Nuclear Weapons in East and West

Authors: Nigel B. Cook

This paper reviews the declassified technical data in the official book "Britain and the H-Bomb". Secrecy-cleared UK thermonuclear warhead historian Lorna Arnold (and her assistant Katherine Pyne) in the UK official history "Britain and the H-Bomb" summarized Atomic Weapons Establishment secret data on UK thermonuclear warhead design tests up to the early interchanges of H-bomb data with America, in 1958-59. The book's information clarifies beyond any doubt the role of plastic foams in dispersing x-rays in the British type of weapon with an isotropically compressed spherical secondary stage, as opposed to the USA use of foam as simply a "radiation mirror" to re-radiate soft x-rays onto the cylindrical Teller Sausage secondary stage requiring only axial compression. Comparing this information to declassified double-primary Russian nuclear warhead design data (see nukegate.org for that) conclusively confirms the different merits of different approaches. This information should be available to inform public debate on not merely whether we have a nuclear deterrent that is efficient and cost effective, but the designs we really need; whether they come from a secrecy-obsessed groupthink culture that drives warhead design into an expensive, inefficient, incredible dead end; or radical, innovative, cheap, credible designs. A summary is given in Fig. 1 of this paper.

Comments: 26 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2023-12-29 20:29:55

Unique-IP document downloads: 2199 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus