Solving Schrodinger equation for an H-atom directly produced r1s < r2p < r2s < r3d < r3p < r3s < r4f u2026 in Born probability density’s radial function, and it fitted perfectly for the pre-Sun ball’s {N,n} QM structural configuration (as proved in paper SunQM-3s3 by assigning the |5,4,m> and |4,0,0> QM states to Jupiter surface atmosphere’s zonal bands and belt bands). However, in all QM text books, for a Z > 1 atom, its ground state electron configuration is always r1s < r2s < r2p < r3s < r3p < r3d u2026 , (that reversed l sub-shell sequence in comparison with the Schrodinger equation’s solution for an H-atom). All QM text books have to explain this difference by using some kind of patches. In the current paper, I (qualitatively) solved this problem by changing the potential V = Vr to V = Vr + Vθφ in Schrodinger equation (with Vr < 0), and with either Vθφ > 0 for the electron-electron’s repulsive interaction in the same l sub-shell, or Vθφ < 0 for the pre-Sun ball’s attractive interaction between the objects in the same l sub-shell. After assuming Vθφ << Vr, and treating Vθφ as a small perturbation of Vr, and then forcing Vθφ to be a function of r-1D, I was able to analyze the Schrodinger equation’s solution semi-quantitatively, and obtained the expected result. Then, I explored Schrodinger equation for Vr > 0, and guessed out a (Bohr formula equivalent) formula for a point-centered repulsive force field, (also with rn = r1 n^2, En = E1 / n^2, but with n ≤ 1, or n" = 1/n, with n" > 0). Then, I proposed a brand new "proton-electron mirror-coupled orbit" model: for an atom with the ground state electron configuration of r1s < r2s < r2p < r3s < r3p < r3d , its nuclear protons has a E/RFe-force energy level ground state configuration of (approximately) r1s > r2s > r2p > r3s > r3p > r3d . Furthermore, the 1s proton and 1s electron, the 2s proton and 2s electron, etc., are always dynamically (or transiently) coupled. This model may be useful in the explanation of the K-capture, or the formation of the black hole (from a {-2,1} star during the gravity collapse). Based on that, I proposed a second new hypothesis: the γ decay may can be attributed to the nuclear proton’s pure E/RFe-force energy level de-excitation (without involving the S/RFs-force). Some semi-quantitative estimations have been calculated to support this hypothesis.