Authors: Jacob Biemond
Utilizing a dimensional analysis, Vavel found a formula for the neutrino mass depending on the Hubble constant H, yielding a mass value of 4.26 meV. Recently, a related formula for the electron neutrino was proposed by Mongan, depending on H and the dark energy parameter ΩΛ. He assumed a spherical model for the electron neutrino and he proposed that its mass depends on the low mass density of the Universe. Furthermore, he assumed that its mass is constrained by the Compton wavelength. The obtained formula predicts a mass m1 of 1.37 meV.
An alternative formula for the mass m1 of the electron neutrino, also depending on H and ΩΛ, can be obtained from a toroidal model of leptons, recently proposed by Biemond. In this model a toroidal shape is assumed for the electron neutrino with a radius r1 of the torus and a radius r2 of the tube. This torus is assumed to be filled with the low mass density of the Universe. A mass m1 of 1.52 meV is obtained in this case.
By combination of the magnetic moment of a massive Dirac neutrino, deduced in the context of electroweak interactions at the one-loop level, and a magnetic moment for a neutrino arising from gravitational origin, a formula for the neutrino mass m1 was obtained in 2015. This result depending on the Fermi constant forms a bridge between electroweak interactions and gravitation. In this case a more accurate value of 1.530 meV was obtained for mass m1.
Comments: 6 Pages, including 1 figure
Download: PDF
[v1] 2023-02-08 16:23:45
Unique-IP document downloads: 191 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.