Mathematical Physics

   

Diagram of the Relationship Between Field and Force and the Cause Analysis of the Misunderstanding of the Nature of the Field

Authors: Xiaotao Peng

There is an implicit assumption in the definition of field (gravitational field, electric field and magnetic field): assuming that there is a unit point field source (unit point mass or unit positive point charge) on the observation point P, the force it receives (gravity, The size and direction of the Coulomb force and magnetic force) are the size and direction of the strength of the field at this point. When the field is further extended to be a continuous and differentiable function in space-time, the above implicit assumption is further expanded to: there is a point field source of one unit at all spatial positions in space-time. The objective reality is that the distribution of field sources in space-time is neither continuous nor stable. As a result, many physical theories, theorems and laws based on fields and field theories cannot be consistent with objective facts. Such as: the law of electromagnetic induction, Gauss's law, Hubble's law, Maxwell's equations, the theory of relativity, quantum mechanics and the Big Bang theory, etc. This article discusses the relationship between field and force in a graphical way, and on this basis points out the reasons why most people misunderstand the nature of field at present. Valuable comments and suggestions.

场(万有引力场、电场和磁场)的定义中隐含了一个假设:假设观测点P点上存在一个一个单位的点场源(单位点质量或单位正点电荷),它所受到的力(万有引力、库仑力和磁力)的大小与方向即为该点上的场的强度的大小与方向。当将场进一步拓展为在时空中为连续可导的函数时,则上述隐含的假设被进一步扩充为:时空中所有的空间位置上均存在一个一个单位的点场源。而客观实际情况是:场源在时空中的分布并非连续,也非稳定不变的。由此导致了诸多以场和场论为基础的物理学理论、定理和定律就不可能与客观事实相符了。如:电磁感应定律、高斯定律、哈勃定律、麦克斯韦方程组、相对论、量子力学和宇宙大爆炸论等。本文以图解的方式对场与力的关系进行一些探讨,并在此基础上指出目前大多数人对场的本质存在误读的原因进行一些分析、探讨与认证,希望有兴趣的朋友们多提宝贵意见与建议。

Comments: 4 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2022-12-04 01:38:42

Unique-IP document downloads: 388 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus