This paper intends to present an alternative Cosmological model to the standard one, proposing a different calculation for the Galactic Recession. By predicting measurements for Stellar distances and Time dilations, it therefore can be falsified through observations. About this, starting from the data of the Supernova SN 1995K and after the recalculation of the Distance Modulus μ without using the K Correction of FLRW (in my opinion wrong: it should not increase μ), we successfully carried out a test on the Time Dilation and one on the Luminosity distance. The results obtained from those verification of this Stellar distance (d = 1,300 Mpc) and this Time dilation (Lorentz factor γ = 0.86 which makes SN 1995K to SN 1990N similar) are reported in viXra: [2207.0051], [2208.0040] and [2208.0152]. I think these are good results even if limited in number and not definitive. Seen also the today’s debate among ΛCDM with FLRW and alternative models, this model should not be discarded.Here, the Universe lies on the surface of a hypersphere which expands at a constant rate with its radius stretching as r=ct. Given the constant expansion speed, it is not necessary to define a new specific type of redshift (Cosmological) to be associated with the Galactic Recession. Here the redshift is Gravitational or Doppler.Even if the validity our model stops (and, with it, the scientific speculation too) at the last 10 billion years, we anyhow need for an explanation as to how this shape of the Universe developed. As we shall see, our idea starts from what in the theory of Bing Bang is referred to as "Last scattering" (we date its Timeline to 720,000 years with a very high temperature). We do not have to change the ΛCDM sequence of events up to the Nucleosynthesis, the Thompson Scattering and the Recombination; so as not to miss many important successful predictions and scientific results of the standard model. It is still early to say but, if most of ΛCDM were safeguarded, then this model with its different metric could solve many, if not all, the problems deriving from the latest observations of the James Webb telescope.(Limited to the recession calculus, you can find the key points in pages 7-9 and 19-26)