We here will discuss basic physics = "physics of particles that form the universe". Particles are the source of fields and carry some invariant, constant properties (like charge, mass) that are used to define physics. Unluckily the current so called "standard model" (SM) left the path of classical modeling and did introduce fields that have no real = physical counterparts. E.g. the so called 4-potential has no real source among particles as the two (E/B)field generators have no common point in space and e.g. the E-field of the proton is not linear in the near field. An other problem is the term mass, that shows a totally different behavior in macroscopic use compared to particle level use. We will explain why E=mc2 breaks down when e.g. the relativistic Dirac equation is used for describing proton proton interactions. There also exist quite a large number of experiments that debunk central "claims" made by SM. So does in general e+/e- annihilation not lead to two 511keV photons. The normal case are 3 photons, what fundamentally contradicts the symmetric wave modeling. Also nobody so far could measure a so called strong force that is different from the magnetic force...At the end of the paper you should understand why SM is not a basic physics model and cannot be used to model particle internals.