Authors: Ken Gonder
It's widely held that light's velocity is fixed. It remains the same for everyone regardless of relative motion. Many believe Einstein proved this through special relativity's time dilation and length contraction for moving objects. But its relativistic effects only work one-dimensionally in the forward direction of linear motion. In our real nontheoretical world of three actual dimensions, light's perpendicular velocity diverges from its forward velocity while exceeding 186,000mi/s. This glaring, unresolvable contradiction plainly demonstrates the conceptual impossibility of light's constancy. It simply has to compound with the motion of its source and that of other reference frames. This is easy to demonstrate. It's also clearly indicated by all of the Michelson-Morley type experiments and confirmed conclusively by Sagnac's. Moreover, light's velocity is also variable. Its speed changes as it traverses the varying density of a gravity field. Einstein asserts this as well despite the nullifying conflict. But the problems with light's constancy don't stop here. Both its factual compounding and its variability have devastating consequences for relativity. They completely undermine its founding premise, which in turn invalidates all of it, including its general theory as Einstein himself even concedes.
Comments: 36 Pages. 16 Diagrams
Download: PDF
[v1] 2022-08-30 00:25:45
[v2] 2023-05-15 01:17:10
[v3] 2023-06-22 18:17:24
[v4] 2024-01-22 00:32:16
[v5] 2024-04-19 20:10:59
Unique-IP document downloads: 498 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.