Authors: Douglas K Robinson
An alternative interpretation of cosmological redshifts derived from the Planck energy-wavelength equation is presented, that in contrast to the velocity-distance interpretation in the ‘Standard’ Lambda-Cold Dark matter (Λ-CDM) model, permits credible explanations of ‘anomalous’ observations without recourse to indeterminate physics such as Dark Energy or Dark Matter.Beyond ‘local’ groups of galaxies which have what are described as ‘peculiar’ motions attributed to genuine Doppler shifts that includes blue as well redshifts, sources with increasing age and distance are found to comprise only of redshifted spectra.Should such cosmological redshifts be considered a consequence of a vanishingly small loss of energy that becomes evident only after millions of years in transit, less exotic and more credible alternative explanations emerge for the Hubble tension, the increasing rate of expansion, and anomalous rotation curves of galaxies.Challenging the claim that the Cosmic Microwave Background is relic radiation of a single primordial event 13.8 billion years ago are the conclusions of a 2005 study by Ibison [4], that found the thermalization of starlight would be inevitable in a Steady-State-Cosmology.From the alternative energy-redshift approach in a steady-state, homogenous, isotropic and stochastic Universe of indeterminate age, the ratio of the emitted energy of Ly-a UV photons to the energy of sources observed at redshifts at z =11.0 according to E(z) = E(rest)/(1+z) = 8.3%. That this ratio corresponds with the change in the Hubble constant H0 early to late universe ~ 8.3%, is contended to be a significant model distinguishing factor that favours a Steady State Cosmological model.
Comments: 3 Pages. New James Webb space telescope findings referenced (July 2022)
Download: PDF
[v1] 2022-07-24 01:14:48
[v2] 2022-07-27 11:16:40
Unique-IP document downloads: 205 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.