Authors: Naohiro Ozawa
The conclusion of this paper is that the “strong interaction” that emerged as the universe developed through the mediation of two pairs of four types of neutrinos ( , , , ) acted on two pairs of four types of quarks/anti-quarks ( , , , ) to form two particle groups each having an electrical charge composition of (+1, -1, 0, 0) [the -on group ( , , , ) and the nucleon group ( , , , )], which became the constituent materials for 120 types of atomic nuclei/anti-atomic nuclei. That is, the emergence of “strong interaction” is the physical force that shouldered the central role within the causal chain that was the development of the universe: from neutrino and quark/anti-quark → nucleon/anti-nucleon → electron/positron, atomic nuclei/anti-atomic nuclei → elements/anti-elements and so on. The quark chromodynamics on “strong interaction” of the Standard Model however accounts for the emergence of “strong interaction” as basically the result of the union of three colors/anti-colors of quarks/anti-quarks and is, therefore, no more than the result of a random accident. Hence, the principle of “strong interaction” according to the Standard Model is not a causal property that emerged in line with the flow of the development of the universe. For that reason, it is not possible for this principle to organize and connect the past, the present, and the future in a sophisticated manner.
Comments: 20 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2022-06-29 20:02:08
Unique-IP document downloads: 96 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.