Authors: Abhishek Majhi
We revisit Boole's reasoning regarding the equation ``$x.x=x$'' that sowed the seeds of classical logic. We discuss how he considered both ``$0.0=0$'' and ``$0.0\neq 0$'' in the ``same process of reasoning''. This can either be seen as a contradiction, or it can be seen as a situation where Boole could not decide whether ``$0.0=0$'' is universally valid -- an elementary ``decision problem'' in the words of Hilbert and Ackermann. We conclude that Boole's reasoning, that included a choice of ignorance, was founded upon the middle way of the Buddha, later mastered by Nagarjuna. From the modern standpoint, the situation can be likened to Turing's halting problem which resulted from the use of automatic machines and the exclusion of choice machines.
Comments: 4 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2022-06-18 12:27:12
Unique-IP document downloads: 197 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.