Authors: Helmut Schmidt
Newton's law of gravitation gives very accurate results for the radii r and velocities v of an orbit. However, they do not give any indication of the diameter of celestial bodies. In this respect, it is fundamental to reconsider the formula for distance laws F prop e_1 e_2 /r^a. This also means putting all the fundamental physical principles to the test, such as the theory of action at a distance, the inertial system, isotropic space, the importance of constants and dimensions in the universe, the difference between matter and antimatter. Basically, a distinction must be made between how nature works and what we, on the other hand, recognize and interpret as nature in a 3-dimensional space. This leads to a TOE with a distance law purely by mathematics, with no constants.In nature, the orbital periods correspond to a binary number. r_Orbit = r_center^n / r_satellite^l . For an observer, a digital time applies and radii correspond to the polynomials with base 2pi and leads to a single formula for all radii, whether radius of celestial body or orbit: r_Orbit = ((2pi)^2 3^n 2^l + (2pi)^2 2^m 2^s) / (1 + 2pi +(2pi)^2). For the solar system, all radii of the planets and moons of the inner planets were calculated, predominate with errors of less than one percent. The exact masses of the elementary particles can be calculated with the same approach, e.g. proton mass. Planck's constant is a consequence of the Coriolis force.
Comments: 8 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2022-02-22 11:29:42
Unique-IP document downloads: 137 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.