This research paper discusses the shortcomings of the currently prevalent definition of multiplication, and according to this paper, the definition of Multiplication is not complete and has many Errors as it does not apply to all types of examples such as negative*negative Rather, the new definition given by us applies well to all examples and also defines the multiplication of negative numbers more efficiently than the current definition The correctness of this new definition means that we should not write 2*2=2+2, but in the new format, although in this example both definitions are correct, but in the example of negative numbers, only the new definition works. Therefore, whether it is positive or negative, the same definition and format should be used which is more perfect because in mathematics a definition will be considered complete only if it works in all types of example numbers and charge According to the mathematics of the Vedic period, multiplication is somewhat different from modern mathematics, and modern mathematics took the basics from ancient Indian mathematics but was not flawless. I found the real meaning of multiplication by doing deep research on Brahmagupta's Mathematics, Vedic Mathematics,Rashi vigyan, Brahmasiddhanta, Upanishads, Rigveda and other Ganit Shashtras Apart from this, we have also explained the correct definition of zero and its actual form which is mentioned in Indian Sanskrit texts.Through the real property and basic nature of zero, we have also given a new dimension to understand the basics of negative and positive number's operation