Relativity and Cosmology

   

New Derivation of Redshift Distance Without Using Power Expansions. II. Additional Redshift Distances, Analyzing the Data of More Quasars, of Some Snia, of the One Black Hole in Galaxy M87 as Well as a Newer Estimation of H_0

Authors: Steffen Haase

In this part of the two-part series of essays, we first derive some equations for further physical redshift distances. We then analyze a catalog with 132,975 quasars, for which both the apparent magnitude m and the redshift z are given, in order to find the today’s value of the parameter β_0 of the theory presented. We then use this value to determine the today’s value of the radius R_0a of the Friedmann sphere using a magnitude redshift diagram of 19 SNIa. With the help of the known values of R_0a and β_0, statements about astrophysical data from the black hole in the galaxy M87 can be made. In addition, the today’s Hubble parameter H_0 results from both parameters. Furthermore, we calculate the values of the further physical redshift distances for the black hole in M87 and all 19 SNIa. The resulting parameter values are: β_0 ≈ 0.731, R_0a ≈ 2,712.48 Mpc and H_0 ≈ 65.638 km / (s ∙ Mpc). The today’s mass density of the Friedmann sphere is ρ_0 ≈ 4.843 x 10-27 g / cm 3. For the mass of the Friedmann sphere we find M_FK ≈ 1.206 x 1056 g. Annotation: Knowledge of the first part [1] of the series of articles is a prerequisite for understanding this article.

Comments: 33 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2022-01-14 12:15:12
[v2] 2022-09-05 14:27:41

Unique-IP document downloads: 157 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus