A key feature of physics theory formulation is the "thought experiment", an instrumental key with specific conditions to unlocking the mechanics of physical phenomena, conditions as this paper highlights that have been overlooked by Einstein’s own thought experiments with his works of Special and General Relativity. To demonstrate such, two processes shall be presented here, the first being an analysis of contemporary physics which holds physical phenomena (namely momentum-inertia-mass) as the basis for physics theory, and the second approach (Temporal Mechanics) using the temporal and spatial perception ability of human consciousness and associated proposed formalism of mathematical logic as the basis for physics theory. The two approaches shall be compared based on what they can both achieve, here the results showing that making physical phenomena the key theoretic basis of physics theory itself leads to paradoxes of temporal and spatial mathematical interplay, whereas making the temporal and spatial human consciousness ability and associated formalism of mathematical logic as the key theoretic basis, as the proposed fundamental time-equation thought experiment, avoids those temporal and spatial abstractions and paradoxes of dimensional analysis for physical phenomena.