Mathematical Physics

   

Time-Domains as the Foundation for Classical Mechanics, the Relativity of Moving Objects, and the Known Field Forces, Presenting the Case for a Unified Field Theory

Authors: Stephen H. Jarvis

Presented here is an empirical time-domain basis for classical mechanics and the associated derivation of c (where at c time=0) as a constant for the unique and independent references of non-zero mass bodies in relative motion. Here, general relativity shall be analysed and those energy requirements which lead to the cosmological constant problem and associated requirement for dark energy. To resolve the cosmological constant problem a new basis for the causality of mass and gravity as a new over-arching temporal scheme of cause-effect shall be presented as one that upholds the time-domain datum reference of physical phenomena of time-now, explaining why physical phenomena is associated exclusively to the time-now time-domain. Here also shall be derived the basis for the equivalence principle and associated conservation of momentum principle. In this process of derivation shall be presented a solution to the ”proton radius puzzle” also forming the basis for cosmic ray (solar wind) generation. Upon all of such shall be derived the known field forces with their empirical basis revealed, presenting the case for a unified field theory.

Comments: 36 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2021-11-24 23:23:00
[v2] 2021-11-30 01:52:03
[v3] 2022-02-18 17:23:34

Unique-IP document downloads: 330 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus