Classical Physics

   

Proof that the Center of Buoyancy is Equal to the Center of Pressure by means of the Surface Integral of Hydrostatic Pressure Acting on the Inclined Ship

Authors: Tsutomu Hori

 In this paper, we prove that the center of buoyancy of a ship is equal to the center of hydrostatic pressure. This subject is an unsolved problem in physics and naval architecture, even though the buoyancy taught by Archimedes' principle can be obtained clearly by the surface integral of hydrostatic pressure. Then we thought that the reason why the vertical position of the center of pressure could not be determined was that the horizontal force would be zero due to equilibrium in the upright state.
 As a breakthrough, we dared to assume the left-right asymmetric pressure field by inclining the ship with heel angle. In that state, the force and moment due to hydrostatic pressure were calculated correctly with respect to the tilted coordinate system fixed to the floating body. By doing so, we succeeded in determining the center of pressure.
 Then, by setting the heel angle to zero, it was proved that the center of hydrostatic pressure is equal to the well-known center of buoyancy, i.e., the centroid of the cross-sectional area under the water surface. Specifically, the above proof is first shown for a rectangular cross-section, and then for an arbitrary shape of floating body by applying Gauss's integral theorem. And we show an extension to the center of buoyancy for a 3-D floating body.

Comments: 21 Pages, 4 Figures, 36 Equations, 46 References, 2 Appendices.
Published in the Bulletin of Nagasaki Institute of Applied Science in Japan, 2022 (January), Vol.61, No.2, Research Notes in Mathematical and Physical Science, pp.135~154.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2021-09-01 02:23:05
[v2] 2021-09-15 00:16:04
[v3] 2021-12-01 01:26:38
[v4] 2021-12-30 01:30:53
[v5] 2023-04-25 04:01:52

Unique-IP document downloads: 899 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus