Authors: Jacob Biemond
Toroidal models for the electron are given by several authors. Essential ingredients in these models are: a radius r1 of the torus, a radius r2 of the tube of the torus and a toroidal factor N, defined as the angular frequency of the charge rotating around the centre of the tube divided by the angular frequency of the charge rotating around the centre of the torus. The proposed model is extended to the muon and the tau lepton, as well as to the three observed neutrinos. Furthermore, the total energy of all leptons is split into two parts: the first part depends on radius r1 and the second part on radius r2.
Agreement between predicted and observed magnetic dipole moments, first order anomalous correction included, is obtained for all charged leptons. In addition, for all these leptons the same ratio between the radii r1 andr2, depending on the fine-structure constant, is found. Moreover, the same value N = 1 is compatible with the observed magnetic dipole moment of all charged leptons.
Using recently proposed theoretical neutrino masses mi (i = 1, 2, 3) and magnetic dipole moments μ(i), the toroidal model can also be applied to neutrinos. For neutrino 1 a value of N = 1 is obtained, whereas values of N = 5.7 and N = 33 are found for neutrinos 2 and 3, respectively. Finally, the toroidal moments of all leptons are calculated. The magnitude of the toroidal moment of the neutrinos increases with increasing values of N.
Comments: 15 Pages. 1 figure and 1 table
Download: PDF
[v1] 2021-06-22 10:14:07
[v2] 2024-07-26 21:14:36
Unique-IP document downloads: 414 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.