Relativity and Cosmology

   

Gravitational Doppler and Level Relativity Solved a Discovered Momentum Paradox and Identified the Cause of Relativity

Authors: Viktor Schatz

We discovered how an inertial frame can be identified to be preferred over the other of being higher relativistic with respective to time dilation. Gravitons were identified as underlying a postulated Gravitational Doppler effect. It was found that a gravitational field of Gravitons is dynamically Doppler shifted. This enabled a generalization to identify static and dynamic gravitational fields to be equally responsible for all relativistic effects and therefore to be added by Gravitons in a proposed Gravitational Level model, a G-level, where every Inertial Frame does have its own summarized Gravitation Level and all relativistic effects are described by comparing them in the height of this level. This explains why it was true in Special Relativity the “moved clocks are slower” as a moved inertial frame has always a higher G-level by additionally Doppler shifting the resting one. A new discovered Momentum Paradox of Special Relativity, which contradicts irreparably the symmetric mass transformation, explained vividly in a be thought cosmic billiard game, was discovered and solved under Gravitational Level Model and a method to calculate the relativistic momentum using Lorentz transformations correctly only in a relativistically limited asymmetric way was introduced. Models of gravitative nature of the acceleration of solar wind particles and of the hot suns corona could be based on present hypothesis and an experiment was introduced to prove it. The dispute is guided in a vividly manner under using relativistic classic thought experiments and can be understood by anyone with an interest in relativistic physic science.

Comments: 19 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2021-06-04 19:27:20

Unique-IP document downloads: 141 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus