Authors: George Bailey
Paul Dirac noticed that the ratio between the dimensions of the universe (visible size and age) and the protons (diameter, duration of the passage of light through the proton) constitutes a large number of about 10^40. And that the ratio of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic force between an electron and a proton is roughly the same. From this he deduced that the strength of gravity is inversely proportional to the age of the universe. He could only make a rough estimate, because of course he did not yet know the more precise value of 13.8 billion years world age assumed today. Especially the evaluation of the data from the Planck space telescope has produced this value in the last 10 years. So today we are in a position for a more detailed evaluation. We will show that gravity could result from an universal time-energy uncertainty relation if we assume that the universe's age is 13.8 billion years. Furthermore we will give by this approach a precise and straightforward formula for the gravitational constant G without magic factors, powers or roots. Finally, we want to describe an approach with which the gravity can be explained as an asymmetry of attractive and repulsive electromagnetic forces by the fact that in a finite universe with age T(u) there can be no electromagnetic interactions with frequencies smaller than the reciprocal of T(u).
Comments: Dirac's LNH confirmation, 13 pages
Download: PDF
[v1] 2021-05-17 18:41:29
Unique-IP document downloads: 574 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.