Authors: Henok Tadesse
We present a simple, clean relativistic derivation of the Sagnac effect from the perspective of the rotating observer/detector. The well-known Sagnac formula just emerged right on the first run of the calculation, without any tweaking of arguments to get the desired result. The key, novel idea introduced in this paper is that two observers moving with the same velocity at the same point of space simultaneously at a given instant of time will observe the same, identical phenomenon ( for example, interference fringe position) at that point, regardless of their motion history before that instant of time. Therefore, we introduce an imaginary inertial observer who is moving with the same instantaneous velocity at the point of light detection as the accelerating observer. The two observers (the real accelerating observer and the imaginary inertial observer) will observe identical phenomena at that point of space and time. Thus, acceleration of the detector/observer is irrelevant and the known non-relativistic Sagnac effect can be understood within the framework of special relativity theory. However, for relativistic speeds, Lorentz transformation / special relativity predicts different fringe shifts for the stationary and the rotating observers. This is a theoretical disproof of special relativity, along with experimental evidences such as the Silvertooth and the Marinov experiments.
Comments: 14 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2021-03-31 19:55:07
[v2] 2022-06-01 03:57:24
Unique-IP document downloads: 383 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.