Authors: Gajendra Singh Solanki
This paper, the tenth in the series of ‘Rudiments of relativity revisited’, explores superluminal communication based on relativistic non-localization of new relativity. The new relativity preserves the lightspeed like the current one but also digs deeper into the mechanism behind this constancy. The relativistic non-localization as a superstate is one of the explanations: a photon exists in a superstate of relativistic non-localization, which collapses on detection such that the lightspeed is preserved in the frame of detection. Is it possible to trick this mechanism for the light to supersede its own speed using one or more cross-frame interruptions meant to collapse its superstate in one frame and relaying another burst of light to be detected in another? The two subsequently relayed light-bursts individually preserve lightspeed in their respective frames of detection, but the net result of the two cross-frame flights can be fast or slow travel in a vacuum. Various caveats, assumptions, and experiments to explore supra or infra luminal communication under new relativity are discussed.
Comments: 6 Pages. This is the tenth paper in the series of 'Rudiments of relativity revisited'. Previous one resolves the LT's interval and phase invariance contradiction with its on clock time. The next one devises RNL based interferometer and lightspeedometer.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2021-01-09 21:28:18
[v2] 2021-02-24 17:08:58
Unique-IP document downloads: 153 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.