Artificial Intelligence

   

A Generalization of Quantum Mass Function: Quaternion Mass Function and the Distance of it

Authors: Yuanpeng He, Fuyuan Xiao

To handle uncertainties and process complex in- formation from different sources, quantum mass function, an efficient method has been proposed to address this issues. On the basis of the quantum mass function, many methods has been designed to indicate the differences among quantum evidences. Nevertheless, they are developed by quantum evidence theory to process traditional basic probability assignments (QBPAs) and not applicable in measuring quaternion BPAs (QTBPAs). Therefore, in this paper, a specific customized method is proposed for the generalized form of quantum mass function, namely quaternion mass function, to accurately demonstrate the dis- tances among disparate evidences given as QTBPAs (QED). Moreover, it is a pioneer to investigate the differences between pieces of evidences in the plane space of quaternion which is reliable and strictly satisfies the axioms of distance. Besides, if QTBPAs degenerate into QBPAs, QED also degenerate into quantum evidential evidence, which indicates the consistency in this new standard of measuring distances. Consequently, QED is derived from the quantum evidential distance and possesses an extensive capability to indicate dissimilarities among QTBPAs. Several numerical examples are offered to check the validity and practical availability of QED.

Comments: 2 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-12-28 04:20:19

Unique-IP document downloads: 227 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus