Relativity and Cosmology

   

Dark Matter Resolution and Critical Density with no Missing Matter

Authors: Gene H. Barbee

The WMAP and PLANCK missions [3][5][17] measured and analyzed the Cosmic Background Radiation. They published V/R=2.26e-18/sec for the current expansion rate and critical density Rhoc= 9.2e-27 Kg/m^3. Using this density, the indicated composition of nature is about 5% normal matter, 23% dark matter and 72% dark energy. Insight is great (and why this is important to me). The WMAP team error is now clear. They assumed that Cosmic Background Radiation temperature 2.725 K is scaled back to the equality of mass density/photon mass density and decoupling. Shortly after the beginning neutrons and protons fused to He4 and released energy. Much later stars released energy. Currently the CBR temperature 2.725 K consists of 60% He4 energy and 40% star energy. But stars didn’t exist during the equality period. This means that the temperature then was lower than the WMAP assumption for each early expansion radius. The criteria for decoupling and equality are obeyed but they occur earlier in time than the WMAP analysis. With earlier equality, the radius was smaller when mass and photon density were equal. The mass associated with density is consistent with protons only. Since the WMAP data was based on angles they could not discern when the significant events occurred. This paper compares two expansion analysis that agree with WMAP 9 year data [5]. Both are based on the Hubble constant converted to kinetic energy. The first analysis replicates WMAP data and explains why it requires a high critical density with only 5% baryons. The second analysis is based on three sources of kinetic energy. This analysis is based on protons and there is no missing matter or dark energy. This is detailed in Part 1 of this document.

Comments: 48 Pages. My email is genebarbee@msn.com.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-12-10 08:54:17
[v2] 2021-01-30 22:34:13

Unique-IP document downloads: 292 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus